copyparty
Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies.
copyparty vs Tiny File Manager
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Web-based File Managers apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| copyparty | Tiny File Manager | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies. | Web based File Manager in PHP, simple, fast and small file manager with a single file. |
| GitHub stars | 47,256 | 6,003 |
| Forks | 1.9k | – |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | 272 | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 609 | 21 |
| Last activity | 2026-10-21 | 2026-07-20 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 (2026-10-14) | 2.6 (2024-11-05) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Maintained |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Python | PHP |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | File Transfer - Web-based File Managers | File Transfer - Web-based File Managers |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- copyparty is more popular on GitHub: 47.3k stars vs 6k for Tiny File Manager.
- copyparty had more commits in the last 12 months (609 vs 21).
- copyparty has more recent repository activity (2026-10-21 vs 2026-07-20).
- copyparty published a release more recently (v1.20.26 on 2026-10-14; Tiny File Manager's latest is 2.6 on 2024-11-05).
- copyparty is licensed under MIT, Tiny File Manager under GPL-3.0. copyparty's license is permissive; Tiny File Manager's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- copyparty is written in Python; Tiny File Manager in PHP.
Summary: copyparty leads on GitHub popularity, commit activity and recent activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Tiny File Manager more popular?
copyparty has more GitHub stars (47,256 vs 6,003 for Tiny File Manager, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, copyparty or Tiny File Manager?
copyparty had more commits over the last 12 months (609 vs 21). The last recorded activity was 2026-10-21 for copyparty and 2026-07-20 for Tiny File Manager. Our health labels: copyparty is “Active”, Tiny File Manager is “Maintained”.
What licenses do copyparty and Tiny File Manager use?
copyparty: MIT. Tiny File Manager: GPL-3.0. copyparty's license is permissive; Tiny File Manager's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run copyparty and Tiny File Manager with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
Tiny File Manager
Web based File Manager in PHP, simple, fast and small file manager with a single file.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Web-based File Managers apps.