copyparty
Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies.
copyparty vs Filestash
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Web-based File Managers apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| copyparty | Filestash | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies. | Web file manager that lets you manage your data anywhere it is located: FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Git, S3, Minio, Dropbox, or Google Drive. |
| GitHub stars | 47,256 | 14,872 |
| Forks | 1.9k | – |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | 272 | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 609 | 504 |
| Last activity | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-05 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 (2026-10-14) | – |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Python | Docker |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | File Transfer - Web-based File Managers | File Transfer - Web-based File Managers |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- copyparty is more popular on GitHub: 47.3k stars vs 14.9k for Filestash.
- Filestash has more recent repository activity (2026-11-05 vs 2026-10-21).
- copyparty publishes GitHub releases (latest v1.20.26); no GitHub release was found for Filestash.
- copyparty is licensed under MIT, Filestash under AGPL-3.0. copyparty's license is permissive; Filestash's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- copyparty is written in Python; the language of Filestash is not listed upstream.
- Deployment options listed upstream: copyparty: none listed; Filestash: Docker.
Summary: copyparty leads on GitHub popularity; Filestash leads on recent activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or Filestash more popular?
copyparty has more GitHub stars (47,256 vs 14,872 for Filestash, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, copyparty or Filestash?
Commits in the last 12 months: copyparty 609, Filestash 504. The last recorded activity was 2026-10-21 for copyparty and 2026-11-05 for Filestash. Our health labels: copyparty is “Active”, Filestash is “Active”.
What licenses do copyparty and Filestash use?
copyparty: MIT. Filestash: AGPL-3.0. copyparty's license is permissive; Filestash's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run copyparty and Filestash with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for Filestash. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
Filestash
Web file manager that lets you manage your data anywhere it is located: FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Git, S3, Minio, Dropbox, or Google Drive.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Web-based File Managers apps.