copyparty
Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies.
copyparty vs miniserve
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Web-based File Managers apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| copyparty | miniserve | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Portable file server with accelerated resumable uploads, deduplication, WebDAV, FTP, zeroconf, media indexer, video thumbnails, audio transcoding, and write-only folders, in a single file with no mandatory dependencies. | CLI tool to serve files and dirs over HTTP. |
| GitHub stars | 47,256 | 8,088 |
| Forks | 1.9k | – |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | 272 | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 609 | 108 |
| Last activity | 2026-10-21 | 2026-11-03 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 (2026-10-14) | v0.35.0 (2026-04-08) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Language / platform | Python | Rust |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~512 MB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $3.5/mo |
| Categories | File Transfer - Web-based File Managers | File Transfer - Web-based File Managers |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- copyparty is more popular on GitHub: 47.3k stars vs 8.1k for miniserve.
- copyparty had more commits in the last 12 months (609 vs 108).
- copyparty published a release more recently (v1.20.26 on 2026-10-14; miniserve's latest is v0.35.0 on 2026-04-08).
- Both are licensed under MIT.
- copyparty is written in Python; miniserve in Rust.
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for miniserve (~512 MB server) than copyparty (~1 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: copyparty leads on GitHub popularity and commit activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is copyparty or miniserve more popular?
copyparty has more GitHub stars (47,256 vs 8,088 for miniserve, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, copyparty or miniserve?
copyparty had more commits over the last 12 months (609 vs 108). The last recorded activity was 2026-10-21 for copyparty and 2026-11-03 for miniserve. Our health labels: copyparty is “Active”, miniserve is “Active”.
What licenses do copyparty and miniserve use?
Both use MIT.
Can I run copyparty and miniserve with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
miniserve
CLI tool to serve files and dirs over HTTP.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Web-based File Managers apps.