bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search engine with web UI, GraphQL API and Servarr stack integration.
bitmagnet vs Transmission
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| bitmagnet | Transmission | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search engine with web UI, GraphQL API and Servarr stack integration. | Fast, easy, free Bittorrent client. |
| GitHub stars | 4,448 | 15,383 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 1 | 495 |
| Last activity | 2026-05-21 | 2026-11-02 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1-beta.1 (2026-05-21) | 4.1.4 (2026-10-24) |
| Maintenance health | Maintained | Active |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Go, Docker | C++, deb |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~512 MB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $3.5/mo |
| Categories | Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP), File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing, Search Engines | File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- Transmission is more popular on GitHub: 15.4k stars vs 4.4k for bitmagnet.
- Transmission had more commits in the last 12 months (495 vs 1).
- Transmission has more recent repository activity (2026-11-02 vs 2026-05-21).
- Transmission published a release more recently (4.1.4 on 2026-10-24; bitmagnet's latest is v0.10.1-beta.1 on 2026-05-21).
- bitmagnet is licensed under MIT, Transmission under GPL-3.0. bitmagnet's license is permissive; Transmission's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- bitmagnet is written in Go; Transmission in C++.
- Deployment options listed upstream: bitmagnet: Docker; Transmission: deb.
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for Transmission (~512 MB server) than bitmagnet (~2 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: Transmission leads on GitHub popularity, commit activity and recent activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or Transmission more popular?
Transmission has more GitHub stars (15,383 vs 4,448 for bitmagnet, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, bitmagnet or Transmission?
Transmission had more commits over the last 12 months (495 vs 1). The last recorded activity was 2026-05-21 for bitmagnet and 2026-11-02 for Transmission. Our health labels: bitmagnet is “Maintained”, Transmission is “Active”.
What licenses do bitmagnet and Transmission use?
bitmagnet: MIT. Transmission: GPL-3.0. bitmagnet's license is permissive; Transmission's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run bitmagnet and Transmission with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for bitmagnet. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
Transmission
Fast, easy, free Bittorrent client.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing apps.