bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search engine with web UI, GraphQL API and Servarr stack integration.
bitmagnet vs DashBeam
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| bitmagnet | DashBeam | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search engine with web UI, GraphQL API and Servarr stack integration. | File transfer tool with peer-to-peer networking, letting you transfer any file with any size. |
| GitHub stars | 4,448 | 10,221 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 1 | 30 |
| Last activity | 2026-05-21 | 2026-10-19 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1-beta.1 (2026-05-21) | v0.7.2 (2026-10-14) |
| Maintenance health | Maintained | Active |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Go, Docker | deb, Docker |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP), File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing, Search Engines | File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing, File Transfer - Single-click & Drag-n-drop Upload |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- DashBeam is more popular on GitHub: 10.2k stars vs 4.4k for bitmagnet.
- DashBeam had more commits in the last 12 months (30 vs 1).
- DashBeam has more recent repository activity (2026-10-19 vs 2026-05-21).
- DashBeam published a release more recently (v0.7.2 on 2026-10-14; bitmagnet's latest is v0.10.1-beta.1 on 2026-05-21).
- bitmagnet is licensed under MIT, DashBeam under AGPL-3.0. bitmagnet's license is permissive; DashBeam's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- bitmagnet is written in Go; the language of DashBeam is not listed upstream.
- Deployment options listed upstream: bitmagnet: Docker; DashBeam: deb, Docker.
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for DashBeam (~1 GB server) than bitmagnet (~2 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: DashBeam leads on GitHub popularity, commit activity and recent activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or DashBeam more popular?
DashBeam has more GitHub stars (10,221 vs 4,448 for bitmagnet, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, bitmagnet or DashBeam?
DashBeam had more commits over the last 12 months (30 vs 1). The last recorded activity was 2026-05-21 for bitmagnet and 2026-10-19 for DashBeam. Our health labels: bitmagnet is “Maintained”, DashBeam is “Active”.
What licenses do bitmagnet and DashBeam use?
bitmagnet: MIT. DashBeam: AGPL-3.0. bitmagnet's license is permissive; DashBeam's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run bitmagnet and DashBeam with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for bitmagnet and DashBeam. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
DashBeam
File transfer tool with peer-to-peer networking, letting you transfer any file with any size.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing apps.