bitmagnet
BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search engine with web UI, GraphQL API and Servarr stack integration.
bitmagnet vs qBittorrent
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| bitmagnet | qBittorrent | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | BitTorrent indexer, DHT crawler, content classifier and torrent search engine with web UI, GraphQL API and Servarr stack integration. | Free cross-platform bittorrent client with a feature rich Web UI for remote access. |
| GitHub stars | 4,448 | 41,362 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 1 | 503 |
| Last activity | 2026-05-21 | 2026-11-03 |
| Latest release | v0.10.1-beta.1 (2026-05-21) | release-5.3.0 (2026-10-20) |
| Maintenance health | Maintained | Active |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Language / platform | Go, Docker | C++ |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~512 MB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $3.5/mo |
| Categories | Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP), File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing, Search Engines | File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- qBittorrent is more popular on GitHub: 41.4k stars vs 4.4k for bitmagnet.
- qBittorrent had more commits in the last 12 months (503 vs 1).
- qBittorrent has more recent repository activity (2026-11-03 vs 2026-05-21).
- qBittorrent published a release more recently (release-5.3.0 on 2026-10-20; bitmagnet's latest is v0.10.1-beta.1 on 2026-05-21).
- bitmagnet is licensed under MIT, qBittorrent under GPL-2.0. bitmagnet's license is permissive; qBittorrent's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- bitmagnet is written in Go; qBittorrent in C++.
- Deployment options listed upstream: bitmagnet: Docker; qBittorrent: none listed.
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for qBittorrent (~512 MB server) than bitmagnet (~2 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: qBittorrent leads on GitHub popularity, commit activity and recent activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is bitmagnet or qBittorrent more popular?
qBittorrent has more GitHub stars (41,362 vs 4,448 for bitmagnet, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, bitmagnet or qBittorrent?
qBittorrent had more commits over the last 12 months (503 vs 1). The last recorded activity was 2026-05-21 for bitmagnet and 2026-11-03 for qBittorrent. Our health labels: bitmagnet is “Maintained”, qBittorrent is “Active”.
What licenses do bitmagnet and qBittorrent use?
bitmagnet: MIT. qBittorrent: GPL-2.0. bitmagnet's license is permissive; qBittorrent's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run bitmagnet and qBittorrent with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for bitmagnet. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
qBittorrent
Free cross-platform bittorrent client with a feature rich Web UI for remote access.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Peer-to-peer Filesharing apps.