Forgejo
Lightweight software forge focused on scaling, federation, and privacy (fork of Gitea).
Two self-hosted Ticketing apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
| Forgejo | Zammad | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Lightweight software forge focused on scaling, federation, and privacy (fork of Gitea). | Easy to use but powerful support and ticketing system. |
| GitHub stars | 5,777 | 6,081 |
| Forks | 1k | – |
| Open issues | 1.6k | – |
| Commits (12 months) | – | 2.6k |
| Last activity | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Latest release | v17.0.1 (2026-10-26) | – |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Docker, Go | Ruby, deb |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~512 MB, 1 vCPU | ~4 GB, 2 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $3.5/mo | $20/mo |
| Categories | Software Development - Project Management, Ticketing | Ticketing |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
Summary: On the numbers we track, Forgejo and Zammad are evenly matched. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
They are close: Forgejo has 5,777 GitHub stars and Zammad has 6,081 (as of 2026-11-05).
Both had repository activity on 2026-11-04. Our health labels: Forgejo is “Active”, Zammad is “Active”.
Forgejo: MIT. Zammad: AGPL-3.0. Forgejo's license is permissive; Zammad's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for Forgejo. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Lightweight software forge focused on scaling, federation, and privacy (fork of Gitea).
Easy to use but powerful support and ticketing system.
Browse all self-hosted Ticketing apps.