Request Inbox
Collect and inspect HTTP requests for testing and debugging. Create and manage inboxes, capture detailed request data, configure custom responses.
Request Inbox vs WebHook Tester
Two self-hosted Software Development - Testing apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| Request Inbox | WebHook Tester | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Collect and inspect HTTP requests for testing and debugging. Create and manage inboxes, capture detailed request data, configure custom responses. | Powerful tool for testing WebHooks and more. |
| GitHub stars | 6 | 552 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 59 | 27 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-02 | 2026-05-14 |
| Latest release | v1.2.0 (2026-10-23) | v2.3.0 (2026-04-13) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Maintained |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Language / platform | Docker | Docker, Go, deb, K8S |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~512 MB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $3.5/mo |
| Categories | Software Development - Testing | Software Development - Testing |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- WebHook Tester is more popular on GitHub: 552 stars vs 6 for Request Inbox.
- Request Inbox had more commits in the last 12 months (59 vs 27).
- Request Inbox has more recent repository activity (2026-11-02 vs 2026-05-14).
- Request Inbox published a release more recently (v1.2.0 on 2026-10-23; WebHook Tester's latest is v2.3.0 on 2026-04-13).
- Request Inbox is licensed under Apache-2.0, WebHook Tester under MIT.
- WebHook Tester is written in Go; the language of Request Inbox is not listed upstream.
- Deployment options listed upstream: Request Inbox: Docker; WebHook Tester: Docker, deb, K8S.
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for WebHook Tester (~512 MB server) than Request Inbox (~1 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: Request Inbox leads on commit activity and recent activity; WebHook Tester leads on GitHub popularity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is Request Inbox or WebHook Tester more popular?
WebHook Tester has more GitHub stars (552 vs 6 for Request Inbox, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, Request Inbox or WebHook Tester?
Request Inbox had more commits over the last 12 months (59 vs 27). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-02 for Request Inbox and 2026-05-14 for WebHook Tester. Our health labels: Request Inbox is “Active”, WebHook Tester is “Maintained”.
What licenses do Request Inbox and WebHook Tester use?
Request Inbox: Apache-2.0. WebHook Tester: MIT.
Can I run Request Inbox and WebHook Tester with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for Request Inbox and WebHook Tester. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
WebHook Tester
Powerful tool for testing WebHooks and more.
Browse all self-hosted Software Development - Testing apps.