Harbor
Cloud native image registry that stores, signs, and scans content.
Harbor vs SeaweedFS
Two self-hosted File Transfer - Object Storage & File Servers apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| Harbor | SeaweedFS | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Cloud native image registry that stores, signs, and scans content. | Distributed file system supporting WebDAV, S3 API, FUSE mount, HDFS, etc, optimized for lots of small files, and easy to add capacity. |
| GitHub stars | 29,672 | 35,916 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 425 | 3.9k |
| Last activity | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-05 |
| Latest release | v2.16.0-rc1 (2026-10-27) | 4.52 (2026-11-02) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language / platform | Docker, K8S | Go |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | File Transfer - Object Storage & File Servers | File Transfer - Object Storage & File Servers |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- SeaweedFS is more popular on GitHub: 35.9k stars vs 29.7k for Harbor.
- SeaweedFS had more commits in the last 12 months (3,903 vs 425).
- SeaweedFS published a release more recently (4.52 on 2026-11-02; Harbor's latest is v2.16.0-rc1 on 2026-10-27).
- Both are licensed under Apache-2.0.
- SeaweedFS is written in Go; the language of Harbor is not listed upstream.
- Deployment options listed upstream: Harbor: Docker, K8S; SeaweedFS: none listed.
Summary: SeaweedFS leads on GitHub popularity and commit activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is Harbor or SeaweedFS more popular?
SeaweedFS has more GitHub stars (35,916 vs 29,672 for Harbor, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, Harbor or SeaweedFS?
SeaweedFS had more commits over the last 12 months (3,903 vs 425). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-04 for Harbor and 2026-11-05 for SeaweedFS. Our health labels: Harbor is “Active”, SeaweedFS is “Active”.
What licenses do Harbor and SeaweedFS use?
Both use Apache-2.0.
Can I run Harbor and SeaweedFS with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for Harbor. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
SeaweedFS
Distributed file system supporting WebDAV, S3 API, FUSE mount, HDFS, etc, optimized for lots of small files, and easy to add capacity.
Browse all self-hosted File Transfer - Object Storage & File Servers apps.