Firezone
Secure remote access gateway that supports the WireGuard protocol. It offers a Web GUI, 1-line install script, multi-factor auth (MFA), and SSO.
Firezone vs Puter
Two self-hosted Remote Access apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| Firezone | Puter | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Secure remote access gateway that supports the WireGuard protocol. It offers a Web GUI, 1-line install script, multi-factor auth (MFA), and SSO. | Web-based operating system designed to be feature-rich, exceptionally fast, and highly extensible. |
| GitHub stars | 9,166 | 44,097 |
| Forks | – | 4.1k |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | – | 46 |
| Commits (12 months) | 3.9k | 2.7k |
| Last activity | 2026-11-05 | 2026-11-05 |
| Latest release | headless-client-1.5.15 (2026-10-29) | 26.11 (2026-11-02) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Elixir, Docker | Nodejs, Docker |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | Remote Access | File Transfer & Synchronization, Remote Access |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- Puter is more popular on GitHub: 44.1k stars vs 9.2k for Firezone.
- Firezone had more commits in the last 12 months (3,854 vs 2,703).
- Puter published a release more recently (26.11 on 2026-11-02; Firezone's latest is headless-client-1.5.15 on 2026-10-29).
- Firezone is licensed under Apache-2.0, Puter under AGPL-3.0. Firezone's license is permissive; Puter's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- Firezone is written in Elixir; Puter in Nodejs.
- Deployment options listed upstream: Firezone: Docker; Puter: Docker.
Summary: Firezone leads on commit activity; Puter leads on GitHub popularity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is Firezone or Puter more popular?
Puter has more GitHub stars (44,097 vs 9,166 for Firezone, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, Firezone or Puter?
Firezone had more commits over the last 12 months (3,854 vs 2,703). Both had repository activity on 2026-11-05. Our health labels: Firezone is “Active”, Puter is “Active”.
What licenses do Firezone and Puter use?
Firezone: Apache-2.0. Puter: AGPL-3.0. Firezone's license is permissive; Puter's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run Firezone and Puter with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for Firezone and Puter. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
Puter
Web-based operating system designed to be feature-rich, exceptionally fast, and highly extensible.
Browse all self-hosted Remote Access apps.