Fedora Commons Repository
Robust and modular repository system for the management and dissemination of digital content especially suited for digital libraries and archives, both for access and preservation.
Fedora Commons Repository vs Samvera Hyrax
Two self-hosted Document Management - Institutional Repository and Digital Library Software apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| Fedora Commons Repository | Samvera Hyrax | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Robust and modular repository system for the management and dissemination of digital content especially suited for digital libraries and archives, both for access and preservation. | Front-end for the Samvera framework, which itself is a Ruby on Rails application for browsing and managing Fedora-based digital repositories. |
| GitHub stars | 254 | 201 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 76 | 648 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-04 |
| Latest release | fcrepo-6.5.2 (2026-07-16) | hyrax-v5.3.1 (2026-10-02) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language / platform | Java | Ruby |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | Document Management - Institutional Repository and Digital Library Software | Document Management - Institutional Repository and Digital Library Software |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- Fedora Commons Repository is more popular on GitHub: 254 stars vs 201 for Samvera Hyrax.
- Samvera Hyrax had more commits in the last 12 months (648 vs 76).
- Samvera Hyrax published a release more recently (hyrax-v5.3.1 on 2026-10-02; Fedora Commons Repository's latest is fcrepo-6.5.2 on 2026-07-16).
- Both are licensed under Apache-2.0.
- Fedora Commons Repository is written in Java; Samvera Hyrax in Ruby.
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for Samvera Hyrax (~1 GB server) than Fedora Commons Repository (~2 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: Fedora Commons Repository leads on GitHub popularity; Samvera Hyrax leads on commit activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fedora Commons Repository or Samvera Hyrax more popular?
Fedora Commons Repository has more GitHub stars (254 vs 201 for Samvera Hyrax, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, Fedora Commons Repository or Samvera Hyrax?
Samvera Hyrax had more commits over the last 12 months (648 vs 76). Both had repository activity on 2026-11-04. Our health labels: Fedora Commons Repository is “Active”, Samvera Hyrax is “Active”.
What licenses do Fedora Commons Repository and Samvera Hyrax use?
Both use Apache-2.0.
Can I run Fedora Commons Repository and Samvera Hyrax with Docker?
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Read more
Samvera Hyrax
Front-end for the Samvera framework, which itself is a Ruby on Rails application for browsing and managing Fedora-based digital repositories.
Browse all self-hosted Document Management - Institutional Repository and Digital Library Software apps.