ejabberd
XMPP instant messaging server.
Two self-hosted Communication - XMPP - Servers apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
| ejabberd | Openfire | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | XMPP instant messaging server. | Real time collaboration (RTC) server. |
| GitHub stars | 6,749 | 3,074 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 612 | 1k |
| Last activity | 2026-11-04 | 2026-11-03 |
| Latest release | 26.09 (2026-09-30) | v5.1.2 (2026-08-17) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | GPL-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Language / platform | Erlang, Docker | Java |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $10/mo |
| Categories | Communication - XMPP - Servers | Communication - XMPP - Servers |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
Summary: ejabberd leads on GitHub popularity; Openfire leads on commit activity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
ejabberd has more GitHub stars (6,749 vs 3,074 for Openfire, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Openfire had more commits over the last 12 months (1,021 vs 612). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-04 for ejabberd and 2026-11-03 for Openfire. Our health labels: ejabberd is “Active”, Openfire is “Active”.
ejabberd: GPL-2.0. Openfire: Apache-2.0. Openfire's license is permissive; ejabberd's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for ejabberd. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Browse all self-hosted Communication - XMPP - Servers apps.