Cypht
Feed reader for your email accounts.
Two self-hosted Communication - Email - Webmail Clients apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
| Cypht | Roundcube | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Feed reader for your email accounts. | Browser-based IMAP client with an application-like user interface. |
| GitHub stars | 1,787 | 7,257 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 860 | 291 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-04 | 2026-10-25 |
| Latest release | v2.13.1 (2026-11-04) | 1.7.5 (2026-10-19) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | LGPL-2.1 | GPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | PHP | PHP, deb |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | Communication - Email - Webmail Clients | Communication - Email - Webmail Clients |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
Summary: Cypht leads on commit activity; Roundcube leads on GitHub popularity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Roundcube has more GitHub stars (7,257 vs 1,787 for Cypht, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Cypht had more commits over the last 12 months (860 vs 291). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-04 for Cypht and 2026-10-25 for Roundcube. Our health labels: Cypht is “Active”, Roundcube is “Active”.
Cypht: LGPL-2.1. Roundcube: GPL-3.0.
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. Check each project's documentation for install options.
Feed reader for your email accounts.
Browser-based IMAP client with an application-like user interface.
Browse all self-hosted Communication - Email - Webmail Clients apps.