ArchiveBox
Create HTML & screenshot archives of sites from your bookmarks, browsing history, RSS feeds, or other sources (alternative to Wayback Machine).
ArchiveBox vs Tube Archivist
Two self-hosted Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
Side by side
| ArchiveBox | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | Create HTML & screenshot archives of sites from your bookmarks, browsing history, RSS feeds, or other sources (alternative to Wayback Machine). | Organize, search, and enjoy your YouTube collection. Subscribe, download, and track viewed content with metadata indexing and a user-friendly interface. |
| GitHub stars | 28,958 | 8,569 |
| Forks | – | – |
| Open issues | – | – |
| Commits (12 months) | 4.7k | 217 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-25 |
| Latest release | v0.9.77 (2026-10-27) | v0.6.0 (2026-10-25) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | MIT | GPL-3.0 |
| Language / platform | Python, Docker | Docker |
| Docker Hub image | archivebox/archivebox | – |
| Docker pulls | 14052.4k | – |
| Est. server size | ~2 GB, 1 vCPU | ~4 GB, 2 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $10/mo | $20/mo |
| Categories | Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) | Media Streaming - Video Streaming, Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
What the numbers say
- ArchiveBox is more popular on GitHub: 29k stars vs 8.6k for Tube Archivist.
- ArchiveBox had more commits in the last 12 months (4,662 vs 217).
- ArchiveBox published a release more recently (v0.9.77 on 2026-10-27; Tube Archivist's latest is v0.6.0 on 2026-10-25).
- ArchiveBox is licensed under MIT, Tube Archivist under GPL-3.0. ArchiveBox's license is permissive; Tube Archivist's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
- ArchiveBox is written in Python; the language of Tube Archivist is not listed upstream.
- Deployment options listed upstream: ArchiveBox: Docker; Tube Archivist: Docker.
- Only ArchiveBox has a Docker Hub image that we detected (archivebox/archivebox).
- Our rough hardware estimate is lighter for ArchiveBox (~2 GB server) than Tube Archivist (~4 GB); this is an estimate from the stack and category, not a benchmark.
Summary: ArchiveBox leads on GitHub popularity, commit activity and Docker Hub availability. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Get the Docker images
ArchiveBox
docker pull archivebox/archiveboxImage on Docker Hub. Ports, volumes and environment variables differ per app; follow the official docs.
Frequently asked questions
Is ArchiveBox or Tube Archivist more popular?
ArchiveBox has more GitHub stars (28,958 vs 8,569 for Tube Archivist, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Which is more actively maintained, ArchiveBox or Tube Archivist?
ArchiveBox had more commits over the last 12 months (4,662 vs 217). The last recorded activity was 2026-11-03 for ArchiveBox and 2026-10-25 for Tube Archivist. Our health labels: ArchiveBox is “Active”, Tube Archivist is “Active”.
What licenses do ArchiveBox and Tube Archivist use?
ArchiveBox: MIT. Tube Archivist: GPL-3.0. ArchiveBox's license is permissive; Tube Archivist's is copyleft (changes you distribute must stay open).
Can I run ArchiveBox and Tube Archivist with Docker?
ArchiveBox has a Docker Hub image (archivebox/archivebox). We did not find one for Tube Archivist, though the upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option.
Read more
Tube Archivist
Organize, search, and enjoy your YouTube collection. Subscribe, download, and track viewed content with metadata indexing and a user-friendly interface.
Browse all self-hosted Archiving and Digital Preservation (DP) apps.