AdGuard Home
User-friendly ads & trackers blocking DNS server.
Two self-hosted DNS apps, compared on the facts we track: GitHub popularity and activity, license, language, Docker images and a rough hosting estimate.
| AdGuard Home | Pi-hole | |
|---|---|---|
| Description | User-friendly ads & trackers blocking DNS server. | Blackhole for Internet advertisements with a GUI for management and monitoring. |
| GitHub stars | 38,155 | 61,667 |
| Forks | – | 3.4k |
| Open issues (incl. PRs) | – | 37 |
| Commits (12 months) | 240 | 262 |
| Last activity | 2026-11-03 | 2026-10-17 |
| Latest release | v0.107.80 (2026-11-03) | v6.5 (2026-10-17) |
| Maintenance health | Active | Active |
| License | GPL-3.0 | EUPL-1.2 |
| Language / platform | Docker | Shell, PHP, Docker |
| Docker Hub image | – | – |
| Docker pulls | – | – |
| Est. server size | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU | ~1 GB, 1 vCPU |
| Est. hosting from | $5/mo | $5/mo |
| Categories | DNS | DNS |
| Links | Website · Source | Website · Source |
Summary: AdGuard Home leads on recent activity; Pi-hole leads on GitHub popularity. The right choice depends on the features you need — read both project descriptions and docs.
This summary is generated from GitHub, Docker Hub and awesome-selfhosted data as of 2026-11-05. It does not rate features or quality.
Pi-hole has more GitHub stars (61,667 vs 38,155 for AdGuard Home, as of 2026-11-05). Stars measure interest, not quality.
Commits in the last 12 months: AdGuard Home 240, Pi-hole 262. The last recorded activity was 2026-11-03 for AdGuard Home and 2026-10-17 for Pi-hole. Our health labels: AdGuard Home is “Active”, Pi-hole is “Active”.
AdGuard Home: GPL-3.0. Pi-hole: EUPL-1.2.
We did not detect a Docker Hub image for either app. The upstream listing mentions Docker as a deployment option for AdGuard Home and Pi-hole. Check each project's documentation for install options.
User-friendly ads & trackers blocking DNS server.
Blackhole for Internet advertisements with a GUI for management and monitoring.
Browse all self-hosted DNS apps.